These agreements are not necessary to justify the common interest, but are useful in defining the mechanism for sharing equipment. “I have found that the Articles in Lexology/Newsstand are closely related to the topics that interest me. The selection function during registration increases the relevance of email content. They are easy to understand, and I guess they are only as long as necessary to cover the essentials. I would recommend it to other lawyers. The Second Circuit supported Shaeffler Group`s decision to do so and found that the communications were conducted “as part of an ongoing joint venture” and were “sufficiently legal to avoid any waiver.”  The financial interest of a party, regardless of its size, does not preclude a court from finding that there is a legal interest and that it is shared with another party where the legal aspects significantly affect the financial interest.  If certain conditions are met, the doctrine allows parties with common legal interests to openly exchange information and pool reciprocal resources without fear of renouncing privileges. The use of the doctrine of common interest for the exchange of information promotes cooperation between similar parties, promotes general cost-sharing, and can help lawyers and clients more effectively address real or imminent claims or defenses.. . . .