University Intellectual Property Agreement

If you are writing an IP policy, check out our database of IP guidelines, manuals, and model agreements. Exceptions. Royalties generated by institutional work (see section 2.1.2) are 100% withheld by the university, unless otherwise agreed in writing, and are awarded by propst and/or Sr. VP of Research in agreement with UR Ventures. Nevertheless, wipo`s Model Ip Directive for Universities and Research Institutes aims to help university leaders develop their internal IP directive and provide a checklist containing key elements to be addressed. In addition, the many sample policies in our database can help you understand how other institutions deal with IP issues. Intellectual property, as used in this Directive, includes not only technologies such as inventions, discoveries, creations or written works, which may be protected by law, such as patents and copyrights, but also the physical or tangible embodiment of the technology, such as biological organisms, plant varieties or computer software. The terms of the cooperation agreement or financing agreements define who owns the established IPR and who can benefit from access to intellectual property, for example. B through a license. In general, as in the case of South Africa, where industry pays the full cost of research and development, industry owns the intellectual property. The University of Rochester strives to assist its faculty and staff in ensuring the commercial development of the intellectual property resulting from its research so that society can benefit from it as soon as possible. Faculties that make discoveries and inventions as part of their academic work are encouraged to develop their inventions in accordance with the academic mission of the university.

The university has guidelines and guidelines that incentivize its researchers while protecting the integrity of the institution`s research. In addition, the university offers its inventors a number of services to help them protect the university`s intellectual property rights, meet the requirements imposed by research sponsors, and promote business development. Countries have adopted different approaches, be it the worker (researcher, professor, etc.), the employer (university/PRI), the state or the organizing agency as the owner of innovations, inventions and other research results developed within universities or PRIs with public funds. University and PRI staff should devote most of their time and intellectual energy to education, research and other programs that support the institution`s mission. Intellectual creativity and invention often produce a physical embodiment of effort. Examples include integrated circuit chips, computer software, biological organisms, technical prototypes and drawings. The following guidelines govern the distribution of such Tangible Research Property (TRP) for research and other non-commercial purposes. TRP`s commercial license is treated at the same time as the commercialization of intangible intellectual property in Section 6. 2.1.2 Institutional work: works carried out under the aegis of the university by collaborators or contractors as a university and not as personal efforts. All “works for rent”, as defined in the Copyright Act, are included. (Computer programs written by employed programmers are a good example.) Work that the university has entrusted to non-employee collaborators, such as academic publications, architectural projects, engineering studies and consultants` reports, also conforms to this term.

In order to fully protect its interests, it is the university`s policy to obtain written consent if the university has an interest in owning a commissioned work. 5. In case of disagreement between the person and the university about property rights (for example. B if submitted by section A.1 or A.2), the Vice-President and the Deputy Headmaster of Research shall examine the case and make a finding of ownership. . . .